![son goku gay sex son goku gay sex](http://xxxpicz.com/xxx/dragon-ball-dragon-ball-male-only-penis-solo-male-son-goku.jpg)
I would suggest that we find out where the server containing this article is located, and having done so defer to the common law of that sovereignty. This page has become nothing more than a test case for what will be allowed on this "encyclopeadia." Luckily for us, the majority of the english speaking world has clearly defined obscenity laws. Having now defined censorhip as a neutral term, I would like to proceed. Censoring individual beliefs to protect a flawed government is WRONG, censoring dangerous or harmful information to protect the people BY a just government is noble. But what service am I doing to society? Some things must be kept from the general populus, no matter what the cost, because some people quite simply do not have the means to deal with all information. If, for example, I were to post extensive instructions detailing the synthesis of VX or Tabun nerve agents, and give the names of manufacturers who could provide the materials, I would be "doing a service to wikipedia" according to the majority here.
SON GOKU GAY SEX FREE
They may have a policy against censorhip in most cases, but wikipedia cannot be free of all order. There are a multitude of subjects which will never be written about here. Censorship in and of itself is NOT a negative thing. As soon as an image that may be objectionable is put forth for deletion, the hordes of civil liberties pundits descend to defend its "educational purpose." Censorship as a negative term applies to a government or ruling body that denies its people the right to express a certain view, or set of text or images, etc. I have read this entire talk page and have found it to be utterly rediculous.